All Manga, Character Designs and Logos are © to their respective copyright holders.
REVIEWS
BadAssRocks on Night by the sea
Rocks
Reply
Rocks on AISHA
This manhua is such an unreal and amazing piece! 🫶🏼, I suggest anyone to read it, the style is very unique and underatanbly underrated :( I will support the author on website if she asked for a fund to keep continuing this manhua 😭 cause she can't be quitting! Not on my watch! I will support her so should everyone of you!
Reply
(4)
Kinda bad on The Night After the Divorce
Art is okaish. But that's not the point. The point is the characterization.
It's both incoherent and deeply misogynistic. And also japanese, but I repeat myself.
The only character who is given a basic amount of effort is FL, whomst incidentally is so fùcked as a person I'm constantly reminded of how Japan was a mistake and maybe, just maybe, a third nuclear strike could actually improve the situation. Two gave us anime, maybe the third time will bring out women rights. You don't know it won't! Don't be so negative!
Okay so, FL. FL is every degenerate's dream of the perfect stay at home sèx slave. She cooks for you. She compliments you. She will have s** with you and pat your head, in a deranged incestual mom-vibe, but also you get to insult, abuse her and generally treat her like literal zebra shīt.
But there is hope! Once she gets cheated on, FL decides that divorce is the only way forward. You might think, woah, she actually can grow as a person and regain autonomy? Fùck you, because the decision makes no fùcking sense at all when you look at her behavior afterwards: it will in fact dash all your hopes and make the character utterly incoherent.
She doesn't change, she remains the old self sacrificing doormat with no dignity, aspiration or a ego, but she is divorced now, I guess. The author describes her as the ideal woman in a word full of slùts (read: normal people) who don't slave away in the kitchen anymore and don't mom their men into failing upward in life. In this crazy narration, the ex isn't wrong because he treated her like an object.
He is wrong because he didn't cherish his object enough. The lesson here is: treat your pets kindly (aka women) or they will find another owner. You know, like a dog.
Japan needs to go. You know I'm right.
3 on the Ivern Scale™️. I'm loading up the bombardiers.
It's both incoherent and deeply misogynistic. And also japanese, but I repeat myself.
The only character who is given a basic amount of effort is FL, whomst incidentally is so fùcked as a person I'm constantly reminded of how Japan was a mistake and maybe, just maybe, a third nuclear strike could actually improve the situation. Two gave us anime, maybe the third time will bring out women rights. You don't know it won't! Don't be so negative!
Okay so, FL. FL is every degenerate's dream of the perfect stay at home sèx slave. She cooks for you. She compliments you. She will have s** with you and pat your head, in a deranged incestual mom-vibe, but also you get to insult, abuse her and generally treat her like literal zebra shīt.
But there is hope! Once she gets cheated on, FL decides that divorce is the only way forward. You might think, woah, she actually can grow as a person and regain autonomy? Fùck you, because the decision makes no fùcking sense at all when you look at her behavior afterwards: it will in fact dash all your hopes and make the character utterly incoherent.
She doesn't change, she remains the old self sacrificing doormat with no dignity, aspiration or a ego, but she is divorced now, I guess. The author describes her as the ideal woman in a word full of slùts (read: normal people) who don't slave away in the kitchen anymore and don't mom their men into failing upward in life. In this crazy narration, the ex isn't wrong because he treated her like an object.
He is wrong because he didn't cherish his object enough. The lesson here is: treat your pets kindly (aka women) or they will find another owner. You know, like a dog.
Japan needs to go. You know I'm right.
3 on the Ivern Scale™️. I'm loading up the bombardiers.
Reply
(1)(4)
